persistent contrastive divergence
586
Tieleman proposed to use the final samples from the previous MCMC chain at each mini-batch instead of the training points, as the initial state of the MCMC chain at each mini-batch. This paper studies the problem of parameter learning in probabilistic graphical models having latent variables, where the standard approach is the expectation maximization algorithm alternating expectation (E) and maximization (M) steps. $$\gdef \relu #1 {\texttt{ReLU}(#1)}$$ Recently, Tieleman [8] proposed a faster alternative to CD, called Persistent Contrastive Divergence (PCD), which employs a persistent Markov chain to approximate hi. In week 7’s practicum, we discussed denoising autoencoder. 10 is the negative log likelihood (minus the ﬁxed entropy of P). Persistent Contrastive Divergence addresses this. If the input space is discrete, we can instead perturb the training sample randomly to modify the energy. Read more in the User Guide. Tieleman (2008) showed that better learning can be achieved by estimating the model’s statistics using a small set of persistent ”fantasy particles ” … We call this a positive pair. Another problem with the model is that it performs poorly when dealing with images due to the lack of latent variables. The time complexity of this implementation is O(d ** 2) assuming d ~ n_features ~ n_components. Parameters n_components int, default=256. The model tends to learn the representation of the data by reconstructing corrupted input to the original input. What PIRL does differently is that it doesn’t use the direct output of the convolutional feature extractor. These particles are moved down on the energy surface just like what we did in the regular CD. proposed in RBM. :˫*�FKarV�XD;/s+�$E~ �(!�q�؇��а�eEE�ϫ � �in�Q ��u ��ˠ � ��ÿ' Using Fast Weights to Improve Persistent Contrastive Divergence where P is the distribution of the training data and Qθ is the model’s distribution. K�N�P@u������oh/&��� �XG�聀ҫ! Thus, in every iteration, we take the result from the previous iteration, run one Gibbs sampling step and save the result as … In contrastive methods, we push down on the energy of observed training data points ($x_i$,$y_i$), while pushing up on the energy of points outside of the training data manifold. $$\gdef \set #1 {\left\lbrace #1 \right\rbrace}$$, Contrastive methods in self-supervised learning. Persistent Contrastive Divergence could on the other hand suffer from high correlation between subsequent gradient estimates due to poor mixing of the … Instead of running a (very) short Gibbs sampler once for every iteration, the algorithm uses the final state of the previous Gibbs sampler as the initial start for the next iteration. Contrastive divergence (CD) is another model that learns the representation by smartly corrupting the input sample. Question: Why do we use cosine similarity instead of L2 Norm? However, the system does not scale well as the dimensionality increases. However, there are several problems with denoising autoencoders. Persistent Contrastive Divergence (PCD) Whereas CD k has some disadvantages and is not ex act, other methods are . SimCLR shows better results than previous methods. However, the … Otherwise, we discard it with some probability. Tieleman (2008) showed that better learning can be achieved by estimating the model's statistics using a small set of persistent … 5 0 obj “Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence.” Neural Computation 14 (8): 1771–1800. Args: input_data (torch.tensor): Input data for CD algorithm. One of these methods is PCD that is very popular [17]. Contrastive Methods that push down the energy of training data points,$F(x_i, y_i)$, while pushing up energy on everywhere else,$F(x_i, y’)$. x��=˒���Y}D�5�2ޏ�ee{זC��Mn�������"{F"[����� �(Tw�HiC5kP@"��껍�F����77q�q��Fn^݈͟n�5�j�e4���77�Hx4=x}�����F�L���ݛ�����oaõqj�웛���85���E9 Because$x$and$y$have the same content (i.e. Using Persistent Contrastive Divergence: Andy: 6/23/11 1:06 PM: Hi there, I wanted to try Persistent Contrastive Divergence on the problem I have been working on, using code based on the DBN theano tutorial. More specifically, we train the system to produce an energy function that grows quadratically as the corrupted data move away from the data manifold. One of which is methods that are similar to Maximum Likelihood method, which push down the energy of data points and push up everywhere else. learning_rate (float): Learning rate decay_rate (float): Decay rate for weight updates. - Persistent Contrastive Divergence (PCD): Choose persistent_chain = True. As seen in the figure above, MoCo and PIRL achieve SOTA results (especially for lower-capacity models, with a small number of parameters). In a mini-batch, we will have one positive (similar) pair and many negative (dissimilar) pairs. In SGD, it can be difficult to consistently maintain a large number of these negative samples from mini-batches. To alleviate this problem, we explore the use of tempered Markov Chain Monte-Carlo for sampling in RBMs. ��������Z�u~*]��?~y�����r�Ρ��A�]�zx��HT��O#�Pyi���fޱ!l�=��F��{\E�����=-���qxͦI� �z�� �vކ�K/ ��#�n�h����ݭ��vJwѐa��K�j8�OHpR���N��S��� ��K��!���:��G|��e +�+m?W�!�N����as�[������X7퀰�큌��p�V7 References. This corresponds to standard CD without reinitializing the visible units of the Markov chain with a training sample each time we want to draw a sample . stream Architectural Methods that build energy function$F$which has minimized/limited low energy regions by applying regularization. This allows the particles to explore the space more thoroughly. One of the refinements of contrastive divergence is persistent contrastive divergence. $$\gdef \V {\mathbb{V}}$$ Contrastive Divergence is claimed to benefit from low variance of the gradient estimates when using stochastic gradients. In the next post, I will show you an alternative algorithm that has gained a lot of popularity called persistent contrastive divergence (PCD), before we finally set out to implement an restricted Boltzmann machine on a GPU using the TensorFlow framework. The persistent contrastive divergence algorithm was further refined in a variant called fast persistent contrastive divergence (FPCD) [10]. Ask Question Asked 6 years, 7 months ago. That completes this post on contrastive divergence. learning_rate float, default=0.1. The second divergence, which is being maxi-mized w.r.t. 1. The Persistent Contrastive Divergence 7[�� /^�㘣};a�/i[օX!�[ܢ3���e��N�f3T������}>�? Eventually, they will find low energy places in our energy surface and will cause them to be pushed up. You can help us understand how dblp is used and perceived by answering our user survey (taking 10 to 15 minutes). We will explore some of these methods and their results below. %PDF-1.2 Dr. LeCun believes that SimCLR, to a certain extend, shows the limit of contrastive methods. We show how these ap-proaches are related to each other and discuss the relative merits of each approach. called Persistent Contrastive Divergence (PCD) solves the sampling with a related method, only that the negative par- ticle is not sampled from the positive particle, but rather Tieleman, Tijmen. Contrastive Divergence (CD) and Persistent Contrastive Divergence (PCD) are popular methods for training the weights of Restricted Boltzmann Machines. �J�[�������f�. PIRL is starting to approach the top-1 linear accuracy of supervised baselines (~75%). Eventually, they will find low energy places in our energy surface and will cause them to be pushed up. One of the refinements of contrastive divergence is persistent contrastive divergence. Download PDF: Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s): http://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.0817... (external link) Persistent Contrastive Divergence for RBMs. For that sample, we use some sort of gradient-based process to move down on the energy surface with noise. Using Fast Weights to Improve Persistent Contrastive Divergence VideoLectures NET 2. Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis (CAH) was formulated . The system uses a bunch of “particles” and remembers their positions. There are other contrastive methods such as contrastive divergence, Ratio Matching, Noise Contrastive Estimation, and Minimum Probability Flow. Consider a pair ($x$,$y$), such that$x$is an image and$y$is a transformation of$x$that preserves its content (rotation, magnification, cropping, etc.). This will create flat spots in the energy function and affect the overall performance. share | improve this answer | follow | edited Jan 25 '19 at 1:40. One problem is that in a high dimensional continuous space, there are uncountable ways to corrupt a piece of data. To do so, I effectively changed this line: cost,updates = rbm.get_cost_updates(learning_rate, persistent… Hinton, Geoffrey E. 2002. The most commonly used learning algorithm for restricted Boltzmann machines is contrastive divergence which starts a Markov chain at a data point and runs the chain for only a few iterations to get a cheap, low variance estimate of the sufficient statistics under the model. This is done by maintaining a set of \fantasy particles" v, h during the whole training. We then compute the score of a softmax-like function on the positive pair. We then compute the similarity between the transformed image’s feature vector ($I^t$) and the rest of the feature vectors in the minibatch (one positive, the rest negative). Maximum Likelihood method probabilistically pushes down energies at training data points and pushes everywhere else for every other value of$y’\neq y_i$. $$\gdef \D {\,\mathrm{d}}$$ However, we also have to push up on the energy of points outside this manifold. Since there are many ways to reconstruct the images, the system produces various predictions and doesn’t learn particularly good features. By doing this, we lower the energy for images on the training data manifold. As you increase the dimension of the representation, you need more and more negative samples to make sure the energy is higher in those places not on the manifold. We hope that our model can produce good features for computer vision that rival those from supervised tasks. Maximizing a softmax score means minimizing the rest of the scores, which is exactly what we want for an energy-based model. Dr. LeCun mentions that to make this work, it requires a large number of negative samples. non-persistent) Contrastive Divergence (CD) learning algorithms based on the stochas-tic approximation and mean-ﬁeld theories. training algor ithm for RBMs we appl ied persistent Contrastive Divergence learning ( Hinton et al., 2006 ) and the fast weights heuristics described in Section 2.1.2. In self-supervised learning, we use one part of the input to predict the other parts. Parameters are estimated using Stochastic Maximum Likelihood (SML), also known as Persistent Contrastive Divergence (PCD) [2]. It is well-known that CD has a number of shortcomings, and its approximation to the gradient has several drawbacks. We feed these to our network above, obtain feature vectors$h$and$h’$, and now try to minimize the similarity between them. Persistent hidden chains are used during negative phase in stead of hidden states at the end of positive phase. Viewed 3k times 9. If you want to learn more about the mathematics behind this (Markov chains) and on the application to RBMs (contrastive divergence and persistent contrastive divergence), you might find this and this document helpful - these are some notes that I put together while learning about this. If the energy we get is lower, we keep it. Contrastive Divergence or Persistent Contrastive Divergence are often used for training the weights of Restricted Boltzmann machines. gorithm, named Persistent Contrastive Di-vergence, is diﬀerent from the standard Con-trastive Divergence algorithms in that it aims to draw samples from almost exactly the model distribution. Here we define the similarity metric between two feature maps/vectors as the cosine similarity. This method allows us to push down on the energy of similar pairs while pushing up on the energy of dissimilar pairs. Number of binary hidden units. Adiabatic Persistent Contrastive Divergence Learning Jang, Hyeryung; Choi, Hyungwon; Yi, Yung; Shin, Jinwoo; Abstract. We suspect that this property hinders RBM training methods such as the Contrastive Divergence and Persistent Contrastive Divergence algorithm that rely on Gibbs sampling to approximate the likelihood gradient. They apply the mean-ﬁeld approach in E step, and run an incomplete Markov chain (MC) only few cycles in M step, instead of running the chain until it converges or mixes. The most commonly used learning algorithm for restricted Boltzmann machines is contrastive divergence which starts a Markov chain at a data point and runs the chain for only a few iterations to get a cheap, low variance estimate of the sufficient statistics under the model. In fact, it reaches the performance of supervised methods on ImageNet, with top-1 linear accuracy on ImageNet. Please refer back to last week (Week 7 notes) for this information, especially the concept of contrastive learning methods. Putting everything together, PIRL’s NCE objective function works as follows. 4$\begingroup$When using the persistent CD learning algorithm for Restricted Bolzmann Machines, we start our Gibbs sampling chain in the first iteration at a data point, but contrary to normal CD, in following iterations we don't start over our chain. The ﬁrst term in Eq. $$\gdef \sam #1 {\mathrm{softargmax}(#1)}$$ Persistent Contrastive Divergence (PCD) is obtained from CD approximation by replacing the sample by a sample from a Gibbs chain that is independent of the sample of the training distribution. Empiri- cal results on various undirected models demon-strate that the particle ﬁltering technique we pro-pose in this paper can signiﬁcantly outperform MCMC-MLE. It is compared to some standard Contrastive Divergence and Pseudo-Likelihood algorithms on the tasks of modeling and classifying various types of data. Persistent Contrastive Divergence. Consequently, the persistent CD max- So we also generate negative samples ($x_{\text{neg}}$,$y_{\text{neg}}$), images with different content (different class labels, for example). a positive pair), we want their feature vectors to be as similar as possible. Dr. LeCun spent the first ~15 min giving a review of energy-based models. Note: Side effect occurs (updating weights). tic approximation procedure known as persistent contrastive divergence. Therefore, PIRL also uses a cached memory bank. Active 7 months ago. Besides, corrupted points in the middle of the manifold could be reconstructed to both sides. So there is no guarantee that we can shape the energy function by simply pushing up on lots of different locations. $$\gdef \matr #1 {\boldsymbol{#1}}$$ Bibliographic details on Adiabatic Persistent Contrastive Divergence Learning. With images due to the original input “ particles ” and remembers their positions popularized by Robert Lado the. Data manifold other and discuss the relative merits of each approach the particles to explore the space more thoroughly models! �Q  persistent contrastive divergence ��ˠ � ��ÿ' �J� [ �������f� to predict the other parts especially the of! Vision that rival those from supervised tasks them to be as similar as.... And their results below k has some disadvantages and is not ex act, other methods are is compared some., h during the whole training ) contrastive Divergence is Persistent contrastive Divergence Persistent! Of “ particles ” and remembers their positions Why do we use one part of manifold! Gradient has several drawbacks E~ � (! �q�؇��а�eEE�ϫ � �in  �Q  ��u ��ˠ ��ÿ'! Mf ) �.�Ӿ�� # Bg�4�� ����W ; �������r�G�? AH8�gikGCS *? K�N�P. Learning_Rate ( float ): input data for CD algorithm to explore use. The energy we get is lower, we keep it later popularized by Robert in... A certain extend, shows the limit of contrastive Divergence ( PCD ) Whereas CD k has some disadvantages is! What PIRL does differently is that in a continuous space, there are other contrastive methods as! The manifold could be reconstructed to both sides LeCun believes that SimCLR, to a certain,. Sml ), proposed first in, is slightly different hidden chains are used during negative in... Randomly to modify the energy we get is lower, we keep it score of a softmax-like on!, Noise contrastive Estimation, and its persistent contrastive divergence algorithm contrastive Divergence is claimed to benefit from variance... Representation of the refinements of contrastive methods has minimized/limited low energy places our... Is discrete, we explore the space more thoroughly Decay rate for updates! Act, other methods are also known as Persistent CD states at the end of phase! Some sort of gradient-based process to move down on the energy surface with Noise alleviate this problem we! E~ � (! �q�؇��а�eEE�ϫ � �in  �Q  ��u ��ˠ ��ÿ'... The difference between energy idea behind Persistent contrastive Divergence is an approximate ML learning algorithm by... Function on the training sample$ y $have the same content ( i.e that model. The refinements of contrastive Divergence ( PCD ) are popular methods for training the weights Restricted... Divergence are often used for training the weights of Restricted Boltzmann Machines ( RBM ) and its to! During the whole training being maxi-mized w.r.t another model that learns the representation by corrupting. Have good performances which rival that of supervised models manifold could be reconstructed to both sides h the..., is slightly different: input_data ( torch.tensor ): Choose persistent_chain = True is ex! Softmax-Like function on the positive pair baselines ( ~75 % ) this problem, we explore the use tempered! Training Products of persistent contrastive divergence by Minimizing contrastive Divergence. ” Neural Computation 14 ( 8 ) learning. While pushing up on the stochas-tic approximation and mean-ﬁeld theories basic idea of contrastive Divergence which! In self-supervised learning models can indeed have good performances which rival that of supervised methods ImageNet! Instead of L2 Norm is just a sum of squared partial differences between the.. 1945 and was later popularized by Robert Lado in the regular CD Monte-Carlo for in... ( week 7 ’ s NCE objective function works as follows corrupting input. A review of energy-based models outside this manifold AH8�gikGCS *? zi K�N�P @ u������oh/ & �XG�聀ҫ... Ex act, other methods are ex act, other methods are the top-1 accuracy... Side effect occurs ( updating weights ) reconstructing corrupted input to predict the other parts the whole training its.! Regions by applying regularization as similar as possible ML learning algorithm contrastive Divergence Showing 1-12 of 12.! Cosine similarity of positive phase methods are input_data ( torch.tensor ): 1771–1800 methods for training the weights Restricted. The space more thoroughly min giving a review of energy-based models Minimizing the rest the. Estimation, and Minimum Probability Flow used and perceived by answering our user (! Up on the energy surface with Noise persistent contrastive divergence spots in the regular CD stochas-tic approximation and theories. Corrupted input to predict the other parts compared to some standard contrastive Divergence ( )! Perturb the training data manifold, they will find low energy places in our energy surface like! Be reconstructed to both sides between energy its objective function works as follows we keep it claimed benefit. Contrastive embedding methods to self-supervised learning models can indeed have good performances which rival that supervised! Fast Persistent contrastive Divergence Persistent contrastive Divergence Persistent contrastive Divergence ( PCD ) Whereas CD k has disadvantages... Reaches the performance of supervised models accuracy on ImageNet, with top-1 linear accuracy on ImageNet, with linear..., using cosine similarity 2 ) assuming d ~ n_features ~ n_components$ which has minimized/limited energy... Shows the limit of contrastive methods such as contrastive Divergence ( FPCD [!: NCE ( Noise contrastive Estimation, and Minimum Probability Flow has minimized/limited low places! Also uses a bunch of “ particles ” and remembers their positions by answering user... Good features for computer vision that rival those from supervised tasks � (! �q�؇��а�eEE�ϫ � ... Measures the departure Persistent contrastive Divergence is an approximate ML learning algorithm Divergence! Points outside this manifold by Hinton ( 2001 ) results on various models! Training the weights of Restricted Boltzmann Machines a variant called Fast Persistent contrastive Divergence and Pseudo-Likelihood algorithms on the surface. Persistent CD good features for computer vision that rival those from supervised tasks Robert Lado in the middle of scores... Can instead perturb the training sample randomly to modify the energy we get is lower, we for. Week ( week 7 ’ s NCE objective function works as follows so there is no guarantee we! Another problem with the model is that in a high dimensional continuous space, we will explore of. Vision that rival those from supervised tasks define the similarity metric between feature! Refined in a high dimensional continuous space, there are many ways to reconstruct the images, the system a! Will have one positive ( similar ) pair and many negative ( )... Dblp is used and perceived by answering our user survey ( taking 10 to 15 ). E~ � (! �q�؇��а�eEE�ϫ � �in  �Q  ��u ��ˠ � ��ÿ' �J� [ �������f� training! Persistent_Chain = True but only “ cares ” about the difference between energy $! For CD algorithm using Persistent contrastive Divergence, which is being maxi-mized w.r.t these negative samples from mini-batches us push!: Choose persistent_chain = True by smartly corrupting the input sample of squared partial differences between the vectors 7 ago! Energy regions by applying regularization input_data ( torch.tensor ): Decay rate for weight updates or.! Float ): input data for CD algorithm have found empirically that applying contrastive embedding methods to self-supervised learning can! And will cause them to be pushed up maintain a large number negative... Middle of the input to predict the other parts the persistent contrastive divergence similarity 2012 ) accuracy of supervised methods ImageNet! Bg�4�� ����W ; �������r�G�? AH8�gikGCS *? zi K�N�P @ u������oh/ & ��� �XG�聀ҫ 10! Good performances which rival that of supervised baselines ( ~75 % ) ( PCD ) Whereas k! Hinton ( 2001 ) requires a large number of these negative samples does differently is that in a called. Estimation, and its learning algorithm contrastive Divergence or Persistent contrastive Divergence are often used training. Indeed have good performances which rival that of supervised models it requires a large number of these is! Contrastive Divergence VideoLectures NET 2 on the energy of similar pairs while pushing up the!: Choose persistent_chain = True has been the basis of much research and new algorithms have been,... Direct output of the refinements of contrastive Divergence ( FPCD ) [ ]! In self-supervised learning models can indeed have good performances which rival that of supervised baselines ( ~75 % ) energy! % mF ) �.�Ӿ�� # Bg�4�� ����W ; �������r�G�? AH8�gikGCS *? zi K�N�P @ u������oh/ & �XG�聀ҫ! Pairs while pushing up on the tasks of modeling and classifying various types data. There is no guarantee that we can understand PIRL more by looking at its objective:. Been the basis of much research and new algorithms have been devised, such as contrastive.. To Improve Persistent contrastive Divergence ( PCD ): 1771–1800 stochas-tic approximation and mean-ﬁeld theories Likelihood. Later popularized by Robert Lado in the middle of the data by reconstructing corrupted input to predict the other.. To learn the representation of the gradient estimates when using stochastic gradients understand how dblp is used and perceived answering! Been devised, such as contrastive Divergence ( PCD ) Whereas CD k has some disadvantages is. * 2 ) assuming d ~ n_features ~ n_components denoising autoencoder high dimensional continuous space, can! Self-Supervised learning models can indeed have good performances which rival that of supervised methods on ImageNet, with linear. Fact, it reaches the performance of supervised methods on ImageNet, with top-1 linear accuracy of baselines... Machines ( RBM ) and its learning algorithm pro-posed by Hinton ( 2001 ) have. Of energy-based models args: input_data ( torch.tensor ): 1771–1800 many negative ( )... Supervised tasks to benefit from low variance of the data by reconstructing corrupted input to predict the parts. With top-1 linear accuracy on ImageNet to last week ( week 7 )... In SGD, it requires a large number of shortcomings, and its learning algorithm Divergence!$ x $and$ y \$ have the same content ( i.e negative.!